|
|
|
|
| |
Is
avian breeding success weathering the storms? Latest results
from the Nest Record Scheme |
| |
|
Dave Leech and Carl Barimore report on the
latest Nest Record Scheme productivity trends and find out how the
birds fared during a 2007 breeding season that was characterised
by unseasonably heavy rain and flooding.
For the second year in a row we appear to have
come to the end of a summer that never really felt like it had started
in the first place, characterised once more by heavy rain and strong
winds. For many Nest Record Scheme (NRS) participants, weather such
as this evokes much the same feelings as those experienced by parents
whose children have gone to school/summer camp/university for the
first time. After all the love and attention invested in finding
the nest and following the breeding attempt, every shower brings
new fears of catastrophe and premonitions of disaster. We feel compelled
to keep checking that the offspring are OK and to interfere if we
suspect that things may be about to take a turn for the worse, but
we must restrain ourselves and let them fend for themselves. The
poor weather in 2007 certainly didn’t dampen the enthusiasm
of nest recorders, however, and an amazing effort by all concerned
saw submissions top the 35,000 mark for the first time since 1999.
It never rains ......
….but it certainly poured in 2007, with several
months achieving the unwelcome status of ‘wettest since records
began’. In terms of productivity, the most successful group
of species were those predating small mammals, the three-five year
population cycle of rodents in the UK having hit a peak in 2007.
Brood sizes of Tawny Owl, Barn Owl and Kestrel were 8%, 18% and
14% larger respectively than predicted from long-term trends. Little
Owl and Starling were also more successful than might be predicted,
both possibly having benefited from increased accessibility to soil
invertebrates in which they primarily feed in the wet weather conditions.
Nuthatch also demonstrated above average breeding success –
researchers in Europe have previously identified a counter-intuitive
positive correlation between the breeding success of this species
and spring rainfall, although the reason for this relationship remains
unclear.
| |
| |
The abundance of rodents in 2007 resulted in
above average Barn Owl clutch and brood sizes.
|
|
Jez
Blackburn |
|
In contrast, many resident open-nesting species showed levels of
productivity that were lower than predictions made using data from
previous years. Resident open-nesters, particularly Robin, Dunnock
and Wren, appeared to be particularly badly affected, exhibiting
reduced clutch and brood sizes and increased failure rates, as did
Reed Warbler. It is interesting to note that ringers participating
in the Constant Effort Scheme (CES, www.bto.org/goto/cesnews.htm)
also reported lower proportions of juveniles of these species in
their catches in 2007. CES and NRS results were not in agreement
across the board, however, nest recorders finding little evidence
for the reduction in productivity of Blue Tit and Great Tit apparent
from the CES dataset. This discrepancy suggests that weather conditions
may also have influenced post-fledging survival and illustrates
the importance of combining a range of techniques when investigating
trends in avian demography.
|
| |
Resident open nesters such as Robin
had a relatively poor year in 2007, producing smaller clutches
and experiencing increased rates of nesting failure. |
|
Jill Pakenham |
|
The importance of being trend-y
While the annual fluctuations in breeding success
provide a fascinating insight into the processes that determine
the number of offspring that birds are able to produce, it is the
long term trends in productivity that are of greatest use to conservationists.
The NRS Concern List highlights those species that have demonstrated
recent declines in both abundance and some aspect of productivity
(see Box 1 for more details). While no new species have been added
as a result of the latest analyses, a recent increase in mean brood
sizes has lead to the removal of Starling, leaving a revised total
of 19 (Box 2). The species of greatest concern are Yellowhammer
and Spotted Flycatcher, which currently exhibit statistically significant
declines in all four breeding parameters derived from the NRS dataset
(clutch size, brood size, egg survival rates and nestling survival
rates). The trends for Linnet, Bullfinch and Nightjar are also worrying,
with three of the four breeding parameters calculated for each species
indicating a significant reduction in productivity. Equivalent trends
are calculated for over 90 species and published on-line each year
in the breeding birds in the Wider Countryside Report – take
a look at the latest results at www.bto.org/birdtrends.
| |
| |
Mean Spotted Flycatcher brood sizes
have been falling since the mid 1980s, during which period the
population has continued to decline. Graphs such as this one
are produced and updated for over 90 species each year and can
be found on-line at www.bto.org/birdtrends. |
|
| Box
1: NRS Data Analysis
NRS data for 94 species were
analysed using the methods outlined in a recent review paper
in Bird Study 50: 254-270. Trends in laying date, clutch and
brood sizes, and in daily nest failure rates over the egg
and chick periods are described by linear of quadratic regression,
as appropriate. Trends were not calculated for those species
having a mean annual sample size of fewer than 10 records
and species with a mean annual sample size of between 10 and
30 records were given the caveat of “small sample size”.
Species are placed on the NRS Concern List
if a) they demonstrate significant declines in some aspect
of breeding performance over at least the last 15 years and
b) they have been placed on the Red or Amber Birds of Conservation
Concern list due to population declines or if there is some
uncertainty over their population status.
|
Looking to the future
It simply wouldn’t be possible for us to
produce this article, or indeed the majority of the articles in
this magazine, without the amazing contribution of our dedicated
volunteers. There are currently over 500 nest recorders in the UK,
but there is always plenty of room for more, so please email nest.records@bto.org
if you’d like to join in. We are also extremely grateful for
the support given under the JNCC/BTO partnership that the JNCC undertakes
on behalf of English Nature, Scottish Natural Heritage, Countryside
Council for Wales and the Environment and Heritage Service in Northern
Ireland. As reported previously, the incredible generosity of Dilys
Breese has enabled us to embark on an ambitious development plan
for the NRS which you can read all about in the next issue of BTO
News, so watch this space!
|
| Species
|
|
Years
on list |
|
Significant
decline in: |
|
Breeding
Population trend |
| Kestrel |
|
3 |
|
Brood
size |
|
>25%
decline |
| Moorhen |
|
16 |
|
Clutch size,
Nest Survival (E) |
|
Fluctuating |
| Ringed
Plover |
|
12 |
|
Nest
survival (E) |
|
Uncertain |
| Lapwing |
|
2 |
|
Nest
survival (E) |
|
>25%
decline |
| Nightjar |
|
2 |
|
Clutch
size*, Brood size*, Nest Survival (E) |
|
Uncertain |
| Tree
Pipit |
|
3 |
|
Nest
survival (E & C)* |
|
>50%
decline |
| Yellow
Wagtail |
|
9 |
|
Brood
size* |
|
>50%
decline |
| Grey
Wagtail |
|
6 |
|
Clutch
size, Brood Size |
|
Probable
decline |
| Pied Wagtail |
|
5 |
|
Clutch size,
Brood size |
|
Uncertain |
| Dunnock |
|
6 |
|
Nest
Survival (E) |
|
>25%
decline |
| Whinchat |
|
3 |
|
Nest survival
(E & C)* |
|
Probable decline |
| Willow
Warbler |
|
10 |
|
Nest
Survival (E) |
|
>50%
decline |
| Spotted
Flycatcher |
|
4 |
|
Clutch
size, Brood size & Nest survival (E & C) |
|
>50%
decline |
| House
Sparrow |
|
5 |
|
Brood
size |
|
>50%
decline |
| Linnet |
|
17 |
|
Brrod
size and Nest survival (C) |
|
>50%
decline |
| Bullfinch |
|
3 |
|
Brood
size, Nest survival (E & C) |
|
>50%
decline |
| Yellowhammer |
|
6 |
|
Clutch
size, Brood size, Nest survival (E & C) |
|
>50%
decline |
| Reed
Bunting |
|
17 |
|
Nest
survival (E) |
|
>50%
decline |
| Corn
Bunting |
|
3 |
|
Brood
size*, Nest Survival (C)* |
|
>50%
decline |
| |
* indicates that the average annual sample
size is small (between 10 and 30 records per year). (E)
indicates nest survival at the egg stage and (C) indicates
nest survival at the chick stage. Breeding population trends
are taken from www.bto.org/birdtrends. The inclusion of
each species on the Red and Amber Lists of Conservation
Concern is indicated by their colour (see http://www.bto.org/psob).
|
|