Our work on HPAI

Our work on HPAI

As the custodian and coordinator of national datasets about the UK’s wild bird populations, we are uniquely placed to provide insights and commentary on avian influenza.

Collaborative science

We work closely with the Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC), Country Nature Conservation Bodies (CNCBs), DEFRA, APHA, the Scottish Government, RSPB, the National Trust and other NGOs.

Throughout the current outbreak, our scientists have coordinated regular meetings with these other organisations, sharing our expertise and data. This ensures our efforts to tackle the outbreak and address its longer-term impacts are informed by all of the available evidence.

We regularly discuss how outbreaks could be managed, how organisations might respond to outbreaks and how we can better record sickness and mortalities.

  • We have published two HPAI-themed issues of our journal Bird Study, where we invited submissions from the wider scientific community. Some 22 papers were published, nine of which included BTO staff authors.
  • In November 2022, we held a workshop jointly with JNCC to discuss the impacts of avian influenza on wild birds, planning for future outbreaks, and conservation and research priorities. Read more about the HPAI Workshop Report >
  • We have developed an HPAI Ringing Framework to mitigate any risks that may be posed to birds by ringing activities during an outbreak of avian influenza. Read more about the HPAI Ringing Framework >
  • We also share our expertise with other stakeholders. Our Director of Science James Pearce-Higgins spoke at the Parliamentary Science, Innovation and Technology Committee about avian influenza on 21 June 2023 – Listen to James address the committee > and to the Environmental, Food and Rural Affairs Committee on avian influenza on 29th November 2022 - listen here.

BTO’s avian influenza research

HPAI is a major part of our avian disease work, with various papers published in the scientific literature. This work covers a number of different themes, from improving methods of data collection to examining the impacts on different species and predicting how the disease might spread. The following sections provide more detail on these themes.

Reporting on mortality levels and improving future data collection

We compiled a dataset that reported on the numbers of dead birds from October 2021 to September 2023, including information from birdwatchers, government agencies and NGOs like the RSPB.

A total of 103,497 dead individuals (90,062 full grown and 13,435 chicks) of 155 species, plus another 3,976 individuals where the species could not be ascertained, were contained within 11,453 reports of dead birds received during the two-year period. Scotland and England accounted for most of the deaths, with the Great Skua, terns (Common Tern and Sandwich Tern), Gannet, Black-headed and Barnacle Goose among the most affected species. Over 7,500 bird carcasses were tested for HPAI, with 80 species testing positive. Mortality data closely matched the species testing positive, and there was a positive correlation between the seabird carcasses recorded and population changes observed in 2023.

The study demonstrated that mortality data can estimate disease impact, aid in real-time outbreak assessments and support better coordination during future events. Standardising data collection and linking to disease surveillance systems is recommended for an improved understanding of wild bird health.

We also looked for signals among data collected by volunteer ringers and birdwatchers. Analyses of ring recovery data can relatively rapidly detect excessive mortality in wild bird populations, including that arising from outbreaks of high pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI). This is one way that we can first detect a major mortality event.

HPAI had such wide-ranging impacts that the effects were found in seawatching data on the eastern side of the UK from the Firth of Forth to Dungeness. We found evidence for changes in migration counts of four species with known HPAI mortality: Great Skua, Sandwich Tern, Black-headed Gull and Roseate Tern.

Population impacts on raptors

In terms of HPAI impacts, raptors have perhaps been the forgotten group as they tend to occur at low densities and in remote areas. Three papers from Scotland highlight the importance of long-term studies in helping to understand the impacts of HPAI. In Scotland, notable declines in breeding productivity among White-tailed Eagles and Golden Eagles were observed in2022, consistent with HPAI-related impacts. Common Buzzards in the Easter Ross Peninsula experienced a sudden reduction in occupied territories and fledging success during 2022 and 2023, coinciding with confirmed HPAI cases in nearby Pink-footed Geese. Peregrine Falcons in southern Scotland showed reduced productivity and increased breeding turnover post-outbreak, though population-level conclusions remained tentative. 

Assessing the vulnerability of species and informing conservation priorities

We carried out vulnerability assessments to identify the species and populations which are at greatest risk from the outbreak and used expert opinion to assess the likely effectiveness of conservation interventions in response to outbreaks of HPAI. 

No conservation interventions were identified as likely to result in a large reduction of the risk of high mortality in wild birds from avian influenza. The two most likely candidates, carcass removal and vaccination, both have significant practical challenges but may work in some circumstances and therefore warrant further testing. Restrictions on research activities, including ringing and tagging, may be counter-productive by reducing the evidence available to understand the impacts and inform wild bird conservation.

Predicting the spread of disease

We have developed tools to inform future planning and decision-making.

Through a collaboration between EURING and EuroBirdPortal, funded by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), we have developed a migration mapping tool which can be used to predict the spread of avian influenza based on wild bird abundance and movements across Europe.

What have we learned?

This process has identified a number of potential improvements in the way that data is collected, which will support more robust data collection in the future. Key recommendations are:

  1. Enhance national and international wild bird population monitoring schemes, together with national disease surveillance schemes.  
  2. Expand standardised carcass reporting and national testing of living and dead wild birds and integrate other data streams, such as ring recoveries, testing and population monitoring data for early detection.  
  3. Invest in and continue to support long-term population studies, ideally multiple studies from across the range of species, to understand the mechanisms through which HPAI impacts wild birds.  
  4. Develop spatial and temporal risk modelling for wildlife disease (e.g. BirdFlu Radar).  
  5. Develop national rapid-response plans to deal with outbreaks, and establish networks of relevant stakeholders and communication pathways.  
  6. Ensure that networks follow a One Health approach and include the relevant environmental, animal and health agencies and eNGOs, among the stakeholder groups.  
  7. Ensure that pre-approved data collection methods and protocols are in place for future outbreaks.  
  8. Prioritise high-risk species: apply vulnerability assessments to guide conservation action.  
  9. Invest in research to better understand areas of uncertainty around impacts on wild birds, and the transmission interfaces between birds, their environment, livestock and humans within a OneHealth framework.  
  10. Understand the different mechanisms behind population recovery (or otherwise) of wild birds after mass-mortality events.  
  11. Take a global perspective, standardise data collection and coordinate across flyways and governments to align efforts. 

What is BTO doing now?

Now the emergency response is over BTO is looking to undertake some of the recommendations. In the Defra-funded project iPREPARE, together with APHA, we are expanding the live testing of seabirds for avian flu viruses and antibodies with the Universities of St Andrews, Liverpool and Essex.  Also, as part of this project, to better understand the interface between wild birds, poultry, other livestock and humans, we have started a GPS tracking project of Carrion Crows in landscapes with and without livestock. 

We continue to develop our predictive capabilities to predict future HPAI presence using the BirdFlu Radar and, together with Natural England are looking to develop more robust detection and monitoring of seabird wrecks.

Data from our volunteers

Our network of volunteers provides crucial information for our research and the wider conservation community, and reveals early warning signs of further significant outbreaks.

Thanks to the efforts of birdwatchers using BirdTrack, we are able to utilise real-time information about sick or dead birds, tracking the location and spread of the disease.

This data enabled us to identify the outbreak's move from Black-headed Gulls to Common Terns, and then to Kittiwakes, as cases occurred, and inform on the ground responses to the virus.

The outbreak has also highlighted the lack of a centralised repository for the reporting of large wild bird mortalities. To tackle this issue, we have asked our BTO/RSPB/JNCC Wetland Bird Survey volunteers to record bird mortalities as part of their counts. Because these counts are carried out every month, they will provide structured information on significant waterbird mortality through the winter months.

Information on dead birds reported by the public that have been fitted with rings by licenced participants in the BTO’s Ringing Scheme has enabled us to identify sites at which mortality has occurred.

While it is not possible to confirm HPAI as the cause of death, this can be inferred by comparing dead bird reporting rates with that from previous years, taking care to account for other potential influences such as weather conditions.

Data on bird locations and movements generated by the efforts of bird ringers also make a very significant contribution to the migration mapping tools referenced above that help policy-makers to assess potential risks.

We are also considering the role of other surveys in monitoring the impacts of avian influenza, such as the Goose and Swan Monitoring Programme and the Seabird Monitoring Programme.


Funding our work

We are funding our HPAI programme of work from our core funds and scheme budgets, and through targeted fundraising efforts. We launched our Avian Influenza Appeal in 2022.